Mr MORRISON (Cook—Prime Minister and Minister for the Public Service) (15:00): Mr Speaker, I thank you for your ruling on the matter, because your ruling on the matter makes clear—just as the member did yesterday in coming to this dispatch box—that, on this occasion, that member has come to the dispatch box again, particularly given what the Attorney-General has set out, with the very clear knowledge that he would know—as I would know, having sat around the National Security Committee of Cabinet table for five of the last six years—that on no occasion would any responsible minister and in particular a prime minister go into any operational matters regarding ASIO or any of these intelligence agencies. So what is the intent of the question? Opposition members interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Prime Minister can pause. I've made myself clear when there are these questions that are the subject of rulings. I'm not going to deal with interjections. The member for Eden-Monaro will leave immediately under 94(a). The member for Eden-Monaro then left the chamber. Mr MORRISON: Mr Speaker, what is the intent of this question? The intent is to infer against a member of this House a disloyalty to this country and that that member has, in some way, been the subject of some investigation. And the member who raised this question knows that by simply coming up here and seeking to smear a member, knowing that the Prime Minister is not in a position to make comment on these matters, that he hopes the mud sticks. What this member is doing here is seeking to smear a member, and I refer to the member for Chisholm. The member for Chisholm, has probably done more than anyone else in this place—like many I would say—to overcome barriers in her life, to overcome discrimination, to overcome domestic violence, to overcome disability, and there are members on the other side of the House who I applaud for doing exactly the same thing. The member for Isaacs should take a good, hard look at himself and he should have a good, hard look at the 1.2 million Australians who will see exactly what he is doing to Australians of Chinese descent. Just because someone was born in China doesn't make them disloyal. What the member for Isaacs is doing is casting a smear on Chinese-Australians. But this is not unknown in the Labor Party, because we remember Michael Daley, the former Labor leader before the last state election, on whom most of those opposite remained silent. He said, 'Asian migrants taking our jobs.' That is what the Labor Party reeks of. I applaud the member for Chisholm. She's a great Australian, who deserves to be in this House. I can't say the same for the member for Isaacs.