Mr TAYLOR (Hume—Minister for Energy and Emissions Reduction) (14:49): I thank the member for his question. As he knows, when we came to office we inherited a budget deficit. We also inherited an emissions deficit against our obligations of over 700 million tonnes. Because of the work of this government, we are now on track to reach our 2020 Kyoto obligations and overachieve those obligations by 367 million tonnes. That is a 1.1 billion tonne turnaround. So not only have we turned around the budget deficit; we have also turned around the emissions reduction deficit. We are looking forward to reaching our 2030 target with the Climate Solutions Package—$3½ billion worth—which lays out to the last tonne how we are going to reach our 2030 obligations, and we are able to do that whilst supporting a strong economy and growing jobs. We have delivered clear policy with clear results—indeed, a policy that's backed by the WA Labor government, the state that the member for Moore is from. And I quote from the state Labor Minister, who said, 'We respect the fact that the current government won the election and has a mandate to follow its policies through.' But the honourable member, the member for Moore, asked about alternative approaches, and I'm aware of a few. We have the member for Hindmarsh, who says that Labor needs a deeply uncomfortable review of its policy platform, including energy and climate. He says, 'This must be ruthless and unsparing.' He's also said that nothing should be excluded or treated as sacrosanct. That shouldn't be surprising to any of us, because 50 times during the election campaign they were not able to answer questions about the details or the impacts of their carbon policies. We know that independent modelling tells us that those policies would have slashed wages and slashed jobs. We then have the member for Hunter, who came into this place yesterday and said, 'Do we have to talk about the carbon price again?' 'Of course we do', he says. Of course we do. The member for Hunter says we should talk about the elephant in the room. Well, let's talk about it. This is the carbon tax that Julia Gillard told us we couldn't have—we wouldn't have. This is the carbon tax that cost jobs and investment and that raised the cost of living, and we know that when it was removed it reduced the cost of electricity. This is the carbon tax that the Australian people turfed out in 2013. They've thrown their entire policy platform up in the air for review, but one classic is back! (Time expired)