Mr BUTLER (Hindmarsh—Deputy Manager of Opposition Business) (14:35): My question is to the Prime Minister. Does the Prime Minister agree with The Australian economics editor Adam Creighton, who says that the government's response to COVID-19 is an act of hysteria because the virus has only led to the deaths of 'quite unwell elderly people'. If not, why is the minister for energy co-hosting a boardroom dinner with Mr Creighton to raise money for the Liberal Party's Eden-Monaro campaign? The SPEAKER: The Leader of the House? Mr Porter: Point of order: that's a question about fundraising, which is clearly a political party matter. The SPEAKER: There were two questions. Honourable members interjecting— The SPEAKER: We're not going to have a ballot on the ruling; I'm just going to make the ruling, okay? There were certainly two questions. The second one, I think, struggles to be in order. I'm happy to hear from the Manager of Opposition Business. Mr Burke: The purpose of the question is to ask whether or not the Prime Minister agrees with the comments that were quoted in the question. The second part of the question is clearly framed at the beginning with 'If not'—so, if the Prime Minister does disagree, why are these sorts of things happening with one of his own ministers? Mr Robert interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Minister for Government Services will cease interjecting. Mr Burke: Both parts of it go to the same issue as to the extent to which the government disagrees. The SPEAKER: The Prime Minister isn't responsible for actions ministers take on party activities, so it's really irrelevant whether he agrees or disagrees. But the first part of the question is in order.