Senator RUSTON (South Australia—Minister for Families and Social Services and Manager of Government Business in the Senate) (14:48): In direct answer to your question, no, I can't, Senator Watt, and I'm not going to. But what I would say to this chamber following the question I received yesterday is: Senator Watt, you can be very, very loose with the facts. Yesterday you came into this place and you accused us of only providing support—I think you quoted a figure of four per cent of Australians living in bushfire affected communities who have been able to access government support. What you failed to mention yesterday, Senator Watt— The PRESIDENT: Order, Senator Ruston. I've got Senator Wong on a point of order. Senator Wong: Mr President, how is this directly relevant? The PRESIDENT: I don't have a habit, as they do in the other place, of interrupting minister's answers. I wait for senators to pick up a point of order. Senator Wong: No, I'm posing the question on it. If the minister wishes, she has plenty of opportunities, as a minister, to debate Senator Watt; I'm happy to stay and watch that. But could she answer this question, not argue yesterday's question, which she was unable to answer. Senator Ruston interjecting— Senator Wong: I'm pleased you've found your brief since yesterday! The PRESIDENT: The minister is entitled to challenge the assertions or assumptions in the question but must remain directly relevant to the terms of the question. I'm listening quite carefully, and I'll continue to do so. The answer must pertain to the announcement and/or challenge or address any other claims contained in the question. Senator RUSTON: I would draw the senator's attention to the first sentence that I uttered, after he asked the question, where I answered the question. If they don't like the idea that I come in here and suggest that I've got evidence that Senator Watt is loose with his facts, I'm sorry about that. We'll move on to the bushfire crisis that we're talking about at the moment. In 2019-20, the bushfire crisis has absolutely exemplified the—(Time expired) The PRESIDENT: Senator Watt, a final supplementary question? Senator Ruston interjecting— Senator Wong interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Order Senator Wong and Senator Ruston. Please, there are only 10 minutes to go. Senator Cormann interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Senator Cormann, on a point of order? Senator Cormann: The interjections are disorderly and the worst culprit when it comes to constant and relentless interjecting, personal interjections as well, is the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate. I ask you to call her to order. The PRESIDENT: I have said before that there is no-one in this chamber with a halo when it comes to interjections, but I do ask that— Senator Wong interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Senator Wong, please come to order while I'm ruling. There are common interjections across this end of the chamber that I can hear and they are all disorderly. We'll continue question time with Senator Watt's question, if they cease. Senator Watt, a final supplementary question?