Mr TAYLOR (Hume—Minister for Energy and Emissions Reduction) (14:38): I thank the member for Robertson for her question. She is in favour of strong policies on this side of the House that will reduce emissions and at the same time keep a strong economy. Just as when we came into office in 2013 we were faced with a severe fiscal deficit, we were faced with a severe emissions reduction deficit, of over 700 million tonnes. And today—as of December last year—we've turned that around to a surplus of 367 million tonnes. That means that we have improved our emissions reduction position by 1.1 billion tonnes in our time in government. We've outlined, down to the last tonne, how we are going to achieve our 2030 obligations. The centrepiece of that is the $3.5 billion Climate Solutions Package. Indeed, it's a policy that is backed by the WA state Labor government. The state Labor energy minister said: … we respect the fact that the current government has won an election and has a mandate to follow its policies through. But there is a risk—and I'm looking at it. Those opposite have no idea what they're for or against. We've got the Leader of the Opposition crab walking away from the member for Maribyrnong's targets—targets which he is still proud of—and he and the member for Sydney are not letting go easily. We have the member for Hindmarsh saying that every Labor policy should be on the table, including climate policy, and saying their policy review should be ruthless and unsparing. Well, I agree with that. And we have the member for Griffith talking about a CPRS in glowing terms in the Federation Chamber. Then we have the member for Hunter saying, 'We have to speak about the carbon tax again,' and they have brought in the architect of the carbon tax—that luminary Greg Combet—to review their climate policies. Labor have thrown their whole platform up in the air for review, but one old classic is back with a vengeance—the carbon tax.