Senator PAYNE (New South Wales—Minister for Foreign Affairs and Minister for Women) (14:12): I can, in fact, because those views which are held by those opposite, who despite all the evidence—the court decisions, the comments by the judiciary, the repeated examples of outrageous unlawful behaviour—continue to see fit to defend law-breakers and to oppose this government's bill. They refuse to acknowledge that the problems run deeper than one man, however disgraceful his behaviours might be. They refuse to drop their policy to scrap the ABCC, something they committed to because they promised the CFMMEU even less oversight. They're engaging in a protection racket of repeat law-breakers in unions, like the CFMMEU, who continue to give the rest of the union movement a bad name. It leads you to wonder: why would those opposite be doing that? Is it because they support law breaking? Is it because they have personal links that they can't get past or is it because they receive millions of dollars from the coffers of law-breaking organisations like the CFMMEU into their accounts every single year? (Time expired)