Mr TURNBULL (Wentworth—Prime Minister) (14:01): I think I will check exactly what the Premier said before I take the Leader of the Opposition's word on it. He has a bit of a track record for misrepresentation. The SPEAKER: The Leader of the Opposition on a point of order. Mr Shorten: I seek leave to table the transcript. It was a question from the Financial Review: 'Do you and your government think negative gearing is a problem?' 'I think I have an answer to that. My answer is: yes, it should be considered.' There it is; black and white. Leave not granted. Mr TURNBULL: We know that the Leader of the Opposition has form in misrepresentation and distortion, but he— Mr Shorten interjecting— Mr TURNBULL: Yes, he is free to wave around whatever he likes. But the one thing he is not very good at is sticking to the facts. Normally, the glass jaw takes a bit longer to appear than this. I mean, really! Seriously, I think we would all be sensitive to charges of misrepresentation if we were so assiduous at it as the Leader of the Opposition. One day after another, any resemblance between what he says and the truth is a matter of coincidence. It is absolutely a matter of coincidence. I am not saying he is never accurate; I am saying he is only accurate when it suits him—when it suits his own political purpose. We have seen him distort and misrepresent and spread falsehoods on one issue after another. It is so touching to see the way he wants to be the ferocious class warrior. Oh yes, Bill Shorten, defender of the poor and the— The SPEAKER: The Prime Minister will refer to members by their correct titles. Ms Plibersek interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Sydney is, again, delaying the Manager of Opposition Business. The Manager of Opposition Business, on a point of order. Mr Burke: On three matters, Mr Speaker: firstly, addressing members by their correct title— The SPEAKER: I have dealt with that. Mr BURKE: secondly, on direct relevance; and thirdly, I thought I would give him a chance to read the document; it is right in front of him. The SPEAKER: No. In fact, while the Manager of Opposition Business is on his feet he might remain on his feet. There is a line here and we are very close to it, so the Manager of Opposition Business can grab that bit of paper back. The Leader of the Opposition has already sought leave to table it. It has been rejected. Mr Burke interjecting— The SPEAKER: No, I do not want you to do that. I do not want to eject you under standing order 94(a). I really do not. Thank you. The Prime Minister has been asked a question, which I have listened to very carefully— Mr Snowdon interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Lingiari will cease interjecting, and whoever else is bellowing in my left ear will cease interjecting. The Prime Minister was asked a question about negative gearing but with a preamble and a fairly broad tagline. I am listening to the Prime Minister carefully. He is only about half way through the answer, and I will keep listening to him. Mr TURNBULL: Thank you very much, Mr Speaker. Yes, the Leader of the Opposition, in his unlikely pose as a tribune of the people, a champion of the pressed and the downtrodden—yes, this is the person who stood up for the workers at Chiquita mushrooms, didn't he. He absolutely sold them down the river. And what about Cleanevent and his friend Cesar Melhem? Did he ever call up Cesar and say, 'Cesar, that was disgraceful'? No, absolutely not. He is his best friend, champions him, parachutes him into the Victorian parliament. It is competing between Cesar Melhem, who sells workers down the river, takes payments for the union and who was talking about kickbacks yesterday—no doubt, kickbacks were on his mind, when you read what is in the paper about Cesar Melhem being investigated for corrupt practices as recommended by the Heydon commission. But then, of course, not content with promoting Cesar, he comes on Kimberley Kitching and puts her in the Senate. This is somebody who is filling in safety forms, safety examinations, for other people and putting workers' lives at risks. What is her reward? A seat in the Senate from the Labor Party. (Time expired)