Senator ROBERTS (Queensland) (14:54): Foreign students can now bring family members with them, a prize for which many are clearly prepared to break the law. Deporting 27,200 crooked students and the thousands of family members they brought with them will free up thousands of homes and help ease the housing crisis and record homelessness that your government has caused through catastrophically high immigration. Minister, isn't it time we freed up homes for Australians who deserve them ahead of continuing to import criminals? The PRESIDENT: Minister Wong? Senator Wong: President, I would ask you to consider whether the use of that adjective, which I would prefer not to repeat, about the students in that question is in order, because it suggests all—I think it was a few hundred thousand—are in fact contravening or on the wrong side of the law or whatever. I do wonder if that's an appropriate inclusion in a question to a minister in this place. The PRESIDENT: Senator Roberts? Senator Roberts: Senator Watt has already admitted that shonks are being weeded out. We want to get rid of them—out of the country. The PRESIDENT: Senator Roberts, the minister was referring to providers of education. Minister Wong? Senator Wong: On the point of order, the fact that some people may have breached the law does not make an entire cohort in breach of the law. That was the implication. It was a clear statement in the question. The PRESIDENT: Senator Roberts? Senator Roberts: We know 27,000— The PRESIDENT: Senator Roberts, you are not in a debate here. You either have a legitimate question or you haven't. I am going to seek the advice of the Clerk. Senator Roberts interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Senator Roberts, we are not in the committee stage. This is question time. You ask your question. It gets ruled in or out of order if a point of order is raised. But you are not in a debate, and you are clearly not in a debate with me. Senator Roberts and Minister Wong, as is my usual practice, I am happy to review the language, but I would remind all senators that language used in questions is ultimately their responsibility and ultimately a reflection on them if there is some offence. So I will call Minister Watt.