Senator RENNICK (Queensland) (15:00): In relation to a 1½ degree reduction in temperature, two executives at the Bureau of Meteorology were recently castigated for giving evidence to a Federal Court judge that was false and unreliable in a deliberate attempt to mislead the court. The case came after it was revealed that the bureau was no longer meeting its obligations in upper air monitoring. Given this behaviour, why should the public trust anything the bureau says about weather records? The PRESIDENT: Senator Rennick, your second supplementary question should really relate to your primary question. It is hard to— An honourable senator interjecting— The PRESIDENT: I'm ruling on this, so I don't need input. It is hard to see that, but I would invite the minister to respond to your question as he sees fit.