Senator CASH (Western Australia—Minister for Employment, Skills, Small and Family Business) (14:57): I thank the senator for the question. I have to say it's disappointing that you took it from your question time team, because I thought that you of all people had more integrity than that. This is nothing more and nothing less than an attack on a member of parliament who has been validly elected by the people of Chisholm. In relation to the article in the Herald Sun, I say this to the Senator: under our immigration system all visa applicants' individual assessments are assessed against all legal requirements. That happens to be a fact. That is what happens. So, Senator, in answer to your question, this is all about more personal attacks on a member of parliament who has been validly elected by the people in her electorate. The PRESIDENT: Order! Senator Wong, on a point of order. Senator Wong: The point of order is on direct relevance. There is a public allegation—the senator is not making the allegation—that the member for Chisholm promised references as, I suppose, an inducement or encouragement for volunteers on her campaign. The question is whether that's an appropriate use of Australia's immigration system. The PRESIDENT: On the point of order, I believe the minister's observations about the operation of the visa system were directly relevant to the question. I believe those are directly relevant to the question. To range outside that policy portfolio area would not be directly relevant to the question. Senator Cash? Senator CASH: I've finished now. The PRESIDENT: The answer is completed. Senator Ciccone, a supplementary question?