Mr HOCKEY (North Sydney—The Treasurer) (14:41): I was a little worried for the member for McMahon. We have released a major Treasury document, we are three quarters of the way through question time and he has been in witness protection. So the Prime Minister has asked me to take this question to give him the answer. This document is prepared under the very same legislation that the member for Lilley prepared the Intergenerational report five years ago. He is still here. I would urge the member for McMahon to get onto his feet and walk over and counsel the well-tanned member for Lilly, seek his counsel. He looks very relaxed. We remember the last one: more air than the Hindenburg, the last IGR. But this time around, we have worked with the Public Service to deliver a document. If there is any part of this document that the member for McMahon wants to dispute, then please stand up and dispute the facts, challenge the facts. We are prepared to engage in that discussion— Mr Dreyfus interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Isaacs will desist. Mr HOCKEY: The member for Isaacs just proves there always has to be more than one clown in a circus. I would say to you: we are always prepared to engage in sensible conversation. We want to. But the suggestion that this is prepared in any way other than the way it has been done by Treasurer Costello or Treasurer Swan—in fact, this is more independent than Treasurer Swan's because we are not running some— Mr Swan interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Lilley! Mr HOCKEY: How is that a surplus going, Swanny? The SPEAKER: The Treasurer will resume his seat. The member for Lilley will withdraw. The member for Lilley knows perfectly well he is using parliamentary language and has been asked to leave the chamber on more than one occasion for similar offences. So I would simply ask him to withdraw. Mr Swan: I am not withdrawing. The SPEAKER: In that case, you may have an early mark and leave under 94(a). Mr HOCKEY: It simply proves what I have been saying. We want to have a sensible, mature debate about where Australia is heading. We want to use all the information available to be part of that debate. We think— Opposition members interjecting— The SPEAKER: There will be silence on my left! Mr Giles interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Scullin is not in his seat and may not speak at all. Mr HOCKEY: Australians deserve the opportunity to participate in a constructive conversation about how we can have a decent quality of life into the future. Most importantly, we want to make sure that the generations that follow us in this great country have the very best future they could possibly have. If we contribute now, we can make sure that tomorrow is even better.