Mr EWEN JONES (Herbert) (15:09): My question is to the Minister the Health. The SPEAKER: The Manager of Opposition Business has abused the standing orders right throughout question time today and will resume his seat. The member for Herbert has the call. The member for Watson will resume his seat. Honourable members interjecting— The SPEAKER: I have asked him to resume his seat. I am sorry, you have had so many abuses of it today. Sit down or leave the chamber under standing order 94(a). Leave under 94(a). The member for Watson then left the chamber. The SPEAKER: The member for Herbert has the call. Mr EWEN JONES: My question is to the Minister for Health. Will the minister inform the House— The SPEAKER: The member for Herbert will resume his seat. I can hardly resist that tie. The member for McMahon. Mr Bowen: A very fine one! Thank you, Madam Speaker. I raise a point of order. Standing order 100 relates to the rules of questions. There is no provision under standing order 100 which indicates that if the Speaker does not like the question it cannot be asked. There are specific rules. That question did not offend any of the elements of standing order 100. The SPEAKER: The member will resume his seat. The Leader of the House. Mr Pyne: Madam Speaker, it will assist the opposition if they read standing order 100(d) at any of the roman numerals. They will find that it offends every one of those. It was full of argument, inferences, imputations, insults, ironical expressions and hypothetical matter. You ruled it out quite correctly. The SPEAKER: The question was totally disorderly. The member for Herbert has the call. Mr EWEN JONES: Thank you very much, Madam Speaker. My question is to the Minister for Health. Will the minister inform the House of the assistance that the government has given to help the fight against Ebola? Why is a consistent and deliberate approach to this issue important?