Mr ANDREWS (Menzies—Minister for Social Services) (15:05): Madam Speaker, I could say to the honourable member opposite that she should not believe everything she reads because this is a very good policy. Ms Macklin interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Jagajaga has asked a question. The minister has the call. Mr ANDREWS: If the member opposite is asserting that a person who is capable of working full time, who has no parenting duties, who is not a disadvantaged job seeker should be on welfare rather than work, then we disagree. We disagree because we believe that young people under the age of 30 who are capable of working full time should be earning or learning. That is what they should be doing. Just as the Prime Minister explained before, that is the policy of this government. What is wrong with that? Mr Burke: Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order as to direct relevance. The question goes to whose idea it was. The SPEAKER: There is no point of order. The minister has the call. Mr ANDREWS: This is the government's policy. I am reminded about the policies of the member opposite. She was up here complaining about a report before. She had no qualms about pushing 80,000 single parents off their payments—no qualms about doing that whatsoever. She had no qualms whatsoever in trying to abolish the carers bonus—no qualms about doing that whatsoever. What hypocrisy coming from the members opposite! The big difference was that, of course, at that stage we did not have a government; we had kindergarten capers. We had the Leader of the Opposition wanting to be the class captain—Julia. We had, of course, Kevin, who wanted all the attention. We had Pete playing with the pink batts. We had Bill out in the sandpit being the class bully. The SPEAKER: The minister will return to the question. Mr ANDREWS: And, of course, Wayne is laughing. He was scribbling on the walls and tearing up the maths books. Mr Burke interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Manager of Opposition Business will resume his seat. And, Minister, you certainly have finished because you were completely in breach of the standing orders in the last part of your question, and you know it. The minister will resume his seat.