Senator WONG (South Australia—Minister for Foreign Affairs and Leader of the Government in the Senate) (14:44): Well, the problem with Senator Canavan's question is an example of an ideological position— Honourable senators interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Senator Wong, I'm sorry. The interjections across the chamber are disorderly. Minister Wong. Senator WONG: The difficulty with Senator Canavan's questions is that they are an example of ideology getting in the way of economic logic. Senator Ayres, I think it was yesterday or the day before, talked about the way in which the government is ensuring jobs and investment in one of the projects in his portfolio— Senator Canavan interjecting— Senator Ayres interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Senator Canavan and Senator Ayres! Perhaps you can go outside and have a chat. Senator WONG: As I was saying, Senator Ayres described very eloquently, yesterday or the day before, the way in which investment by government is ensuring jobs in Gladstone. Senator, you know, because you are an economist, that your government invested in the CEFC. You also know that utilising government funds to leverage private sector investment is all about Australian jobs. (Time expired) The PRESIDENT: Senator Canavan and Senator Ayres, the running commentary needs to stop.