Senator GALLAGHER (Australian Capital Territory—Minister for the Public Service, Minister for Finance, Minister for Women, Manager of Government Business in the Senate and Vice-President of the Executive Council) (14:03): I can't stand here and answer to every conversation, or have insight into every conversation that the Treasurer has had with anyone, including Ms Wood. I would hope that her appointment to this senior position in the economic portfolio would be welcomed by those opposite. She is a serious candidate with a serious CV and an incredible level of achievement in the roles that she has held, and I would have hoped that this chamber would have seen the opportunity to congratulate her in this role. The government don't form the view that we have to agree with every position that individuals may hold. If Ms Wood has positions that she holds that may differ from the government, that is entirely reasonable. Th e PRESIDENT: Senator Hume is there a point of order? Senator Hume: Yes, a point of order on direct relevance. If the minister doesn't know the answer, I would very much appreciate it if she would go away and come back to the chamber with an answer. She can take that on notice. She did say she didn't have an answer. She can take that on notice. The PRESIDENT: Senator Hume, that is not a point of order. The minister did answer your question. It is not a point of order; it is a debating point. Minister, did you have anything to add? Senator GALLAGHER: I did answer it straight up. Senator Hume didn't like the answer but I can't answer for every conversation the Treasurer has had. (Time expired) The PRESIDENT: Senator Hume, a second supplementary?