Senator WONG (South Australia—Minister for Foreign Affairs and Leader of the Government in the Senate) (14:28): What I would say is—what was the date? 2005? Well, there you go. There are people who would get to vote today who had only just been born at that time, and I would say that what we— Senator Ruston interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Senator Ruston! Senator WONG: I don't need to filibuster. You interrupt us enough so you don't get many questions. We don't have to do anything. Senator Ruston interjecting— Senator WONG: Well, hang on. You just had a go at me, and when I respond that's personal? The PRESIDENT: Senator Wong, I'll take you back to the question. Opposition senators interjecting— Senator WONG: Oh, right. Okay. So, when you're saying it, it's fine. When I'm doing it, it's personal. That's an interesting double standard. The PRESIDENT: Senator Wong, please resume your seat. Senator Hanson-Young? Opposition senators interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Order on my left! Senator Hanson-Young: A point of order, President: the clock has been running. I understand that Senator Penny Wong is being distracted over here, but I would like the answer to my question: when will this government introduce a climate trigger? The PRESIDENT: Senator Hanson-Young, I did call the minister back to the question. Senator WONG: I'm happy for the clock to be reset. Senator Hanson-Young, the point I was making before the interjection is that this was some time ago. The Prime Minister, obviously, in 2005 was responding to the circumstances as he assessed them in his role then. We have made the same assessment now, and that has resulted in the policy that we took to the election of very substantial reductions—very ambitious reductions—in Australia's emissions between now and 2030, as well as a net zero commitment and the policies that will transition the Australian economy. Unlike the Greens, and I appreciate you have a different view, we actually have to do the hard yards of implementing that. We are an emissions intensive economy, and changing our economic base, our economic structure, in the way that this implies is a tough thing to do. It's also the right thing to do for the future, for future jobs and the sorts of jobs that will thrive in a net zero— (Time expired) The PRESIDENT: Senator Hanson-Young, a second supplementary?