Senator FARRELL (South Australia—Minister for Trade and Tourism, Special Minister of State and Deputy Leader of the Government in the Senate) (14:11): Thank you, Senator Chandler. Senator Birmingham interjecting— Senator FARRELL: With all due respect to Senator Birmingham, I am quite capable of answering my own questions and don't need his— Opposition senators interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Order on my left! Senator FARRELL: I find it difficult to understand why the coalition—this is the second question today that you've asked basically asking the same question that was answered yesterday. Would you be surprised, Senator Chandler, if the Prime Minister, who's doing a wonderful job, had any different view about tax cuts than the finance minister?—who's doing an amazing job, given the mess that you left her to— Senator Watt interjecting— Senator FARRELL: Yes! I'd forgotten about that. At least we have a finance minister who is trusted by his— Senator Cash interjecting— Senator FARRELL: Well, they trust him, too. Senator Cash interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Senator Cash, a senator is on her feet. Senator Chandler? Senator Chandler: I have a point of order on relevance. It was a very specific question, and the minister has been going for 93 seconds now. It does require just a one-word answer, if he could provide it. The PRESIDENT: The minister is being relevant. Thank you, Senator Chandler. Please continue, Minister Farrell. Senator FARRELL: Well, can I say to Senator Chandler: if you want to answer my questions, then there's no point in you asking the questions to me. You might as well answer them yourself. But look, you've asked the same question to me that you asked to Senator Gallagher yesterday— (Time expired) The PRESIDENT: Senator Chandler, a first supplementary question?