Senat or WATT (Queensland—Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry and Minister for Emergency Management) (14:22): As I said in my previous answer, the foot mats were rolled out and installed in every international airport in Australia on Monday and Tuesday this week. Again, I point out that that compares to zero sanitised foot mats that were ever rolled out— The PRESIDENT: Senator Watt. Senator WATT: by the former government— The PRESIDE NT: Senator Watt! Senator WATT: when there were outbreaks in a— The PRESIDENT: Senator Watt! Senator WATT: number of— The PRESIDENT: Senator Watt! Senator WATT: countries— The PRESIDENT: Senator Watt! I don't want to have to call you five times before you respond. Senator McKenzie is on her feet on a point of order. I expect you to sit down. Thank you. Senator McKenzie: My point of order is on relevance. I was going to this: when the biosecurity response zones were established at 12 midnight on Friday 22 July, how many foot mats were actually operational? The PRESIDENT: I will draw Senator Watt back to the question. Senator Wong, on the point of order? Honourable senators i nterjecting— The PRESIDENT: Order! Senator Watt, did you wish to pursue— Senator Wong: As I understand it, that— Senator McGrath interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Senator McGrath— Senator Wong: No, that's fair enough. The PRESIDENT: I will ask you to be silent. Senator Wong: On the point of order—as I understand it, Senator McKenzie made a point of order—I'd make this point: a point of order is not a debating point. Senator McKenzie is at the moment— Senator Henderson interjecting— Senator Wong: Well, you know, that's life! That's life. We have our roles in this democracy, don't we! We all understand them. Senator McKenzie— An opposition senator interjecting— Senator Wong: Would you like to take a point of order, then maybe I can have mine? Thank you, I'd appreciate that. Senator McKenzie is engaging in debating points. Now, she's entitled to those points. There's an opportunity for her after this to do so. But it is not a point of order on relevance to tell the minister that, because he's given a different date, in his response to the question, to the one she's identified, that somehow is not relevant. The PRESIDENT: Senator Watt, you have 40 seconds remaining. Senator WATT: I don't know if I can be any more clear as to when the mats were put down, but I thank Senator McKenzie for bringing to the attention of the chamber one of the other pioneering measures put in place by this government, which has never been done by any other government in this country—including the former government—and that is the establishment of biosecurity response zones in our international airports. I have repeatedly said that the response of this government has been the strongest biosecurity response we've ever seen— The PRESIDENT: Senator Watt, please resume your seat. Senator McKenzie on a point of order? Senator McKenzie: The biosecurity response zone was established. How many mats were in place— The PRESIDENT: Senator McKenzie, order! Resume your seat. If you are calling a point of order, you need to be immediately relevant to that point, and not debate it. Is there a point of order? Senator Watt. Senator WATT: This government is doing more than any government has ever done about any foot-and-mouth outbreak across the country—sanitised foot mats, biosecurity response zones, more biosecurity officers—you did nothing; we're picking up the slack. (Time expired)