Senator RUSTON (South Australia—Minister for Families and Social Services and Manager of Government Business in the Senate) (14:57): Thank you very much, Senator Sheldon, for your question. The government has announced measures over previous weeks and we come today to this place again with another package so that we can assist as many Australians as possible to get to the other side of what is an unprecedented crisis. We were absolutely focused in the first instance, with our first package that came out, which was the jobseeker package and the corona supplement, to make sure that we addressed the concerns of, and the impact on, those who are the most vulnerable in our society, those people who find themselves without income. Today, obviously, we have another significant package. It is probably the biggest package that this parliament will ever have to address. Hopefully, we will never again have to be in a position to address a package the size of $130 billion. This package will look to add on top of the previous two packages to support another group of Australians who have been impacted by the coronavirus. Today, as we did when we were here last time, as we did before the parliament got up, this government continues to put in place a range of different measures to make sure that a broad range of Australians— The PRESIDENT: Senator Watt on a point of order? Senator Watt: On relevance, Mr President. Again, we have a minister refusing to answer the question as to whether particular categories of workers are not eligible for the jobseeker payment. We don't need another speech about how great the government is. We'd just like an answer to our question. The PRESIDENT: Senator Watt, that was the first part of the question. The second part of the question was somewhat broader and commenced with 'what is the government's plan'. With respect, I am listening to the minister— Senator Wong interjecting— The PRESIDENT: I just need to finish. I'm listening to the minister. The second part of the question was more broadly worded. Today after question time we will have an opportunity to debate the nature of answers to questions. Senator Wong, you were seeking the call? Senator Wong: With respect, Mr President, the word 'plan' doesn't exist on its own. The word 'plan' in the question referred directly to those who are not eligible for either JobKeeper or jobseeker payments. My submission is that direct relevance goes to the way in which the word 'plan' is used. Ministers can't just pick a word and extrapolate it from the circumstances. The PRESIDENT: I take the point. The question was: what is the government's plan for those who have—the question claimed—'fallen through the cracks'? I believe that was the phrase that was used. I'm listening to the minister, who is addressing a range of issues. I think that question was by its nature broad. There's an opportunity after question time to debate the nature of answers and what senators think of those answers. I'll continue to listen very carefully to the minister. She's now been reminded of it twice. Senator RUSTON: As I was trying to point out to those opposite, the measures that have been put in place are extremely comprehensive and seek to address the concerns that are raised about people who find themselves in particular circumstances. That, in the first instance, with our changes to the jobseeker payment and the corona supplement, was about dealing with people who did not have a job. I note that you raised the issue in relation to visas and those people who are in Australia who do not have direct access to benefits. A number of measures have been put in place, but a particular one that I would draw your attention to is the ability for those that are in Australia who have work rights as part of their visas to be able to access their superannuation. If not, they are welcome to go home. (Time expired) The PRESIDENT: Senator Sheldon, a supplementary question?