Senator McKENZIE (Victoria—Minister for Agriculture and Leader of The Nationals in the Senate) (14:30): We want a transparent approach—an accountable approach—to how the water within the basin is actually accounted for so that all Australians can have confidence that, yes, our environmental assets are getting the water that we all agree they should, but also, importantly, that those communities and those irrigators actually have water that they need to sustain everyday living and, indeed, productive agriculture capacity throughout the basin. That is why, for the 450 you were talking about, we actually instigated a socioeconomic test with a range of criteria to be assessed and agreed before any of that water can be recovered. The PRESIDENT: A point of order, Senator Hanson. Senator Hanson: My point of order is: will the government look at taking back those foreign owned water licences to get the water back— The PRESIDENT: Senator Hanson, that's the third time you've raised a point of order by restating part of your question. It's not an opportunity to restate part— Senator Hanson: Well, I've got 17 seconds left for the minister to answer— The PRESIDENT: Senator Hanson, please resume your seat. I can't instruct the minister how to answer a question. Points of order on direct relevance are not opportunities to restate a preferred part of a question. Senator McKENZIE: Senator Hanson, obviously, water licensing is the purview of the state governments within the basin. I'm sure they'll look at the ACCC recommendations into water-licensing arrangements and water-purchasing arrangements very closely, and then that will form some of their— (Time expired)