Senator CORMANN (Western Australia—Minister for Finance and the Public Service, Vice-President of the Executive Council and Leader of the Government in the Senate) (14:13): There is no inconsistency between the statements by Prime Minister Morrison and— Opposition senators interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Order on my left! I need to be able to hear the minister's answer. Senator CORMANN: I'm a non-English-speaking-background humble immigrant, but what I would put to you is that I do understand the difference between the word 'received' and the word 'considered'. Let me confirm again for you in plain English: the report was received by the cabinet in May and, indeed, the deliberative process of cabinet commences with the consideration of that report as a very important input to the cabinet deliberation by the relevant and responsible minister, which, on this occasion, is the Attorney-General. That is the same process that applied under the previous government and, indeed, under governments of both political persuasions. There is actually nothing new in this. If you look at the Westminster tradition, going back hundreds of years, you will find that that is entirely consistent. (Time expired) The PRESIDENT: Senator Pratt, a final supplementary question.