Mr ALBANESE (Grayndler—Prime Minister) (14:10): I really do thank the Deputy Leader of the Opposition for the question. We passed legislation in this House for 43 per cent by 2030, opposed by those opposite, and net zero by 2050, opposed by those opposite. When we passed the 43 per cent by 2030, one of the provisions that was carried with amendments was that the Climate Change Authority had to give us advice about future targets. That is the law. That is the law. It was passed by this parliament; it was passed by both chambers. The Climate Change Authority gives us the advice based upon the science, and then we announce the target based upon the science consistent with getting to net zero by 2050. That's the process. But for those opposite, who don't have a 2030 target, to actually stand up and say, 'What's your target in 2035'—that is, after 2030—is just extraordinary. The climate change minister will be giving his annual statement—again consistent with the legislation that was carried in this parliament. He will be giving that at the end of this week, but I'll give you a preview. We are on track for achieving the targets that we have established. Not only have we got a target, but we've also told you how we'll get there. We'll get there through the safeguard mechanism, firstly, taking the top emitters— Mr Jones interjecting— The SPEAKER: Order. The Assistant Treasurer will withdraw that remark. Mr Jones: I withdraw. The SPEAKER: The Manager of Opposition Business on a point of order. Mr Fletcher: On relevance. It was a very specific question: can the Prime Minister guarantee it won't lead to increased energy prices for Australian families? If he can't give that guarantee, he should admit it. The SPEAKER: The question contained 'why is the government keeping targets secret'? If the Prime Minister is explaining part of the question about— Mr Rick Wilson interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for O'Connor will leave the chamber under 94(a). The member for O'Connor then left the chamber. The SPEAKER: If we're dealing with points of order, particularly from your manager, I would expect you would want to hear that and show respect. The Prime Minister is being directly relevant. He wasn't asked about alternative approaches, he wasn't asked about alternative policies, he hasn't gone into that space. I will listen carefully to make sure he directly relevant, but he couldn't be more directly relevant if he is articulating why the government is pursuing what they're doing. Mr ALBANESE: The short answer is I'm complying with the law! That's the short answer. Those opposite don't have a target. We not only have a target of 43 per cent; we've told you how we'll get there. The Safeguard Mechanism on the top emitters is working, and the Capacity Investment Scheme is working even better than we envisaged. We have a plan. We have a process to get to that objective. Those opposite don't have a target for 2030, oppose net zero by 2050 and have a nuclear plan sometime in the 2040s and no idea how you keep reliability of energy supply in the meantime—none. They have no idea, no costings and no plan.