Ms BURNEY (Barton) (14:41): My question is to the Minister for Women. The minister failed to answer the question yesterday, so I ask: does the minister agree with herself that this Liberal government is widely seen as 'homophobic, antiwomen climate change deniers'? The SPEAKER: I have a concern with that question. I obviously haven't memorised every aspect of the Hansard, but I will flag my concern now. That question cannot be identical to the question from yesterday. The Manager of Opposition Business. Mr Burke: On a point of order— Honourable members interjecting— The SPEAKER: To those interjecting: the Manager of Opposition Business actually has a job, and he doesn't need your help. Mr Pyne interjecting— Mr Burke: You'll always help me, Christopher! Yes, point of order: two things. Firstly, the question is different to the question from yesterday. Secondly, the rule on the same question only applies if the question has been fully answered, which, yesterday, it clearly wasn't. The SPEAKER: No, that's just a matter of your judgement. The Manager of Opposition Business can resume his seat for a second. You don't get to score on your judgement on how answered a question was. I could detain the House for a lengthy period of time on this, but Practice makes it very, very clear that that would only apply if a minister simply didn't say a word. The whole history of this place is well-written. The Manager of Opposition Business. Mr Burke: I was referring to the requirement in the standing orders that a question cannot be asked again if it has been fully answered; I was giving you a reference to that. In terms of the first part of it, the question yesterday included these words but had another section added to it, and today's question is different. The SPEAKER: Rather than rule it out unilaterally, I just wanted to flag the concern. I will call the minister.