Mr ABBOTT (Warringah—Prime Minister) (14:48): I have no doubt that there are some doctors who do not like the GP co-payment, just as there are some pharmacists who I am sure do not like the PBS co-payment that members opposite support. I accept that there are some doctors who do not support the position that the government has; on the other hand, there are many doctors who do support the position that the government has. In fact, the AMA's position is that it is not against a co-payment in principle. The position of the Australian Medical Association is that it is not against a co-payment in principle. We are happy to keep talking with the AMA about how this modest co-payment is best introduced. We do support a modest co-payment, like Bob Hawke, like the member for Fraser and not too much like but a little like, perhaps, the member for Jagajaga. We think that a co-payment does make sense, and it is very important to keep Medicare sustainable. Dr Leigh: Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order, which goes to standing order 68. The Prime Minister knows that he is misleading the House. The SPEAKER: In accordance with the ruling that I made earlier, there is no infringement of standing order 68. I call the honourable Leader of the Opposition. Mr Shorten: The Prime Minister said he has got some doctors who support it; here are 3,000 who don't. I seek to table the document. The SPEAKER: The member will resume his seat. That is an abuse of the standing orders, and you know it. Opposition members interjecting— The SPEAKER: I call the honourable member for Longman, and we will have some silence. Mr Burke: Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. Leave was sought and we have not heard— The SPEAKER: No, he did not. Mr Shorten: Yes, I did. The SPEAKER: You might have meant to, but you didn't. The member will resume his seat. Mr Shorten: Madam Speaker, I seek leave to table— The SPEAKER: It is too late. We will have the member for Longman.