Senator McCARTHY (Northern Territory—Minister for Indigenous Australians) (14:55): When we talk about the ideological pursuit of net zero, we know where the Nationals sit but we have no idea where the Liberals sit on net zero. In fact, if you listen to the media or if you go up to— Senator Canavan: I have a point of order on relevance. The question went to a government decision and the release of a decision regulatory impact analysis. Immediately the minister started talking about an opposition party. I don't think that is relevant. I also seek leave to table the consultation regulatory impact assessment— The PRESIDENT: Leave is not granted. Senator Canavan: which includes a carbon tax of $179 and which includes seeking to reduce speed limits— The PRESIDENT: Order! Senator Canavan, resume your seat. It is hard for me to take you seriously when you stand up and make a point of order if you then deliberately ignore me when I try to seek order and you continue on to make a statement. I have said time and time in this place: make your point of order and don't make a statement. Senator Wong: First, in relation to the document, Senator Canavan, there are courtesies, as you are aware. If those are observed, our general view is usually to be amenable to tabling. Those courtesies can be extended if the whips are consulted in the usual way. In relation to point of order itself, I would humbly submit that a discussion about net zero ideology probably does invite a discussion about the opposition. The PRESIDENT: Senator Canavan, the words 'net zero ideology' were part of the question. I will listen carefully to the minister. If she's not addressing the question I will draw her to it. Senator McCARTHY: I've finished.