Senator GALLAGHER (Australian Capital Territory—Minister for the Public Service, Minister for Finance, Minister for Women, Manager of Government Business in the Senate and Vice-President of the Executive Council) (14:44): To begin with, I'm not aware of the publication that Senator Liddle outlined in her question nor the material as it has been presented, so I think, in the first instance, before being in a position to answer, I would want to see that. I don't think it's unusual that there would be discussion about the Voice over the next few months as we lead up to the referendum. Across this country, I think there will be quite a number of articles written in quite a number of publications as organisations seek to get information out about the Voice and, if they are supporting the Voice, why they are supporting the Voice. The PRESIDENT: Do you rise on a point of order, Senator Liddle? Senator Liddle: Yes, it is a point of order. While I appreciate the response in relation to not having seen it, the question does go to whether it is a reasonable representation to just present the yes case. The PRESIDENT: The minister is being relevant to your question. Minister, have you finished your answer? Senator GALLAGHER: I was just going to say that we would want to see that publication before I am in a position to answer the question comprehensively. But I don't think it is unusual that organisations will have a view on the referendum and that they would seek to outline some of the reasons why they have that view. I don't think that is unusual. If there is anything further I can provide, or if that publication that you quote from can be provided, I am happy to come back to the senator. The PRESIDENT: Senator Liddle, a first supplementary?