Senator GALLAGHER (Australian Capital Territory—Minister for the Public Service, Minister for Finance, Minister for Women, Manager of Government Business in the Senate and Vice-President of the Executive Council) (14:36): The money that would have normally returned to our budget will go back into pharmacy; we make that 100 per cent commitment. We want to work with pharmacy about how these changes will be rolled through. So we have responded to them— Senator Ruston: That was not the question. Senator GALLAGHER: Senator Ruston, it is not your turn. Senato r Ruston interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Senator Ruston! Senator GALLAGHER: We have responded to pharmacy about the rollout of this administration. You're obviously arguing for people to pay more for their medicines, so there you go. That's what you're doing. You are wanting them to pay more. We will make those investments back into pharmacy to make sure they can do new programs, more programs and, indeed, programs that were facing a funding cliff under the former government. We'll work with them on the phasing of this, so, coming in in September, then coming in in January— The PRESIDENT: Minister Gallagher, please resume your seat. Senator Ruston. Senator Ruston: On a point of order on relevance, I think you'll find that the question that was asked by the senator at the other end of the chamber is not the question that is being answered by the minister. You may draw her attention to it, unless she doesn't understand the question. The PRESIDENT: Thank you, Senator Ruston. The minister is being directly relevant. Minister, please continue. Senator GALLAGHER: If the question relates to whether the government will fund the other income, not related to the one that's returning to government, that is not our intention. But we do want to work with pharmacy about the new things they can do— (Time expired) The PRESIDENT: Senator Tyrrell, a second supplementary?