Senator RUSTON (South Australia—Minister for Families and Social Services and Manager of Government Business in the Senate) (14:01): I'm assuming they're two separate questions in relation to legal advice and the date at which we were advised that income compliance and income matching was not a valid means by which— An opposition senator interjecting— Senator RUSTON: And I will stand by the assurance that I gave to the chamber, and I have taken on notice the exact date and I will provide that back to the chamber at my soonest convenience. Senator Wong interjecting— Senator RUSTON: Senator Wong, as soon as I have the opportunity to find the exact date. I was not asked yesterday for the exact date, I would also like to put on the record, despite those interjecting opposite. In relation to legal advice, as is the normal practice, Senator Gallacher—the practice that you undertook when you were in government—we do not provide advice. It is a longstanding practice of successive governments in this chamber and in the other chamber. Senator Wong: A point of order on direct relevance: the question did not go to the content; it went to the date on which legal advice was sought. The PRESIDENT: Has the minister concluded her answer? There was three seconds remaining. She has. Senator Gallacher, a final supplementary question?