Senator REYNOLDS (Western Australia—Minister for Defence) (14:39): I totally and utterly reject the premise of your question. You are saying there has been a breach. I have seen no evidence of a breach. You have demonstrated no evidence of a breach. I have told you what the Defence policy— The PRESIDENT: Order, Senator Reynolds! Senator Watt, on a point of order? Senator Watt: On relevance: this whole series of questions is predicated on an answer that the minister gave yesterday, in which she said that this footage was obtained from the defence department's website, to which policies apply. That's the breach. The PRESIDENT: Senator Watt, you are attempting to make a point about the content of an answer. The minister was directly addressing an assertion contained in the question. She is directly relevant if she is doing that. In this case, the minister was entirely directly relevant using, in fact, the same words contained in the question. I remind senators that there's an opportunity to debate the merits of answers at another time. Senator REYNOLDS: As I said at the beginning of my first answer, the question I took on notice yesterday was relevant and I took it on notice to get further information. I have provided further information as the Minister for Defence, and as the Minister for Defence it is very clear what the answer is.