Senator CASH (Western Australia—Minister for Jobs and Innovation) (14:54): Senator Cameron, yet again all because you say something does not make it true. I have been consistent in my evidence. You will be aware that I gave answers based on the knowledge I had at the time, and when that knowledge changed I corrected the record. In relation to the actual issue, what those on the other side forget is this: the matter came about because the AWU are refusing to provide evidence— The PRESIDENT: Senator Wong on a point of order. Senator Wong: The point of order is direct relevance. I know this minister just wants to throw mud in an attempt to get out of it. But the direct relevance is this: it was a question about a prior statement and a question as to the accuracy of the prior statement. How can she say it is not an investigation into her or her office? That was the only question. Senator Ian Macdonald interjecting— Senator Wong: Thank you, Senator Macdonald; I'm always so grateful for your advice! The point of order is direct relevance. There is one question. The PRESIDENT: Senator Wong, you have reminded the minister of the question, so I do not need to. The minister's been reminded of the question and I call upon her to continue her answer. Senator CASH: As I said, in relation to what this matter is actually about, it came about because the AWU are refusing to provide evidence that the donations made when Mr Shorten was national secretary were properly authorised. Those on the other side can throw as much mud as they like. The PRESIDENT: I'll call Senator Cameron for a supplementary question.