Senator WONG (South Australia—Minister for Finance and Deregulation) (14:06): I tell you what, mate, we will not be using a catering company, which is the standard that you lot have set. We will actually judge ourselves by higher standards, the standards that Peter Costello set. Senator Brandis interjecting— Senator WONG: I will take that interjection, Senator Brandis. What is disrespectful— The PRESIDENT: Order. Senator Wong, I have told you already in question time today to ignore the interjections. Senator Brandis, interjections are disorderly and you know that. Senator WONG: What is disrespectful is the disrespect shown to the Australian community by those opposite, who reckon they can come along and use catering companies to do their costings, who use accountants who have been found to have acted unprofessionally and then come in here with a straight face to ask us questions about costings. Senator Cormann: Mr President, I rise on a point of order going to relevance. It is a very specific point of order, and it relates to the minister's requirement to be directly relevant to the question. There was only one question, and there is only one answer that could be directly relevant. Can the minister actually give a guarantee in the Senate, here and now, that the Mid-Year Economic and Fiscal Outlook will give an indication of how the government is going to identify $120 billion worth of spending cuts? The PRESIDENT: There is no point of order. Senator WONG: The commitments we have given, which you will not match, is that we will comply with the Charter of Budget Honesty in the midyear update and in the budget and in our election costings—something that your economic team, of which you are supposedly a part, have never done. If you want to talk about high taxes, which was part of your question, tell us about the 26 taxes that— (Time expired)