Mr ALBANESE (Grayndler—Prime Minister) (15:01): The Greens political party, of course, did vote with the coalition to delay the Housing Australia Future Fund, and they did vote with the coalition to block build-to-rent, just in the last fortnight. Mr Chandler-Mather interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Griffith has asked his question. Mr ALBANESE: That would have meant 160,000 new affordable rental homes as a result, and they voted against it. Mr Chandler-Mather interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Griffith will cease interjecting or be warned. Mr ALBANESE: I mean, if the Leader of the Opposition votes with the Greens any more times, he's going to have to get a hyphen in his surname! It just keeps going. You guys, over in the Senate, blocked build-to-rent, delayed the Housing Australia Future Fund and voted with the coalition to block Help to Buy, which is sitting in the Senate as well. Of course, one of my local members in Grayndler has claimed, as to going forward with the Minns Labor government's efforts to build more housing in Sydney, that the Greens member for Balmain is out there saying that building more homes is unlikely to have a meaningful impact on the housing crisis. It is unbelievable that they oppose every single measure. Indeed, the member for Griffith is supporting a campaign against new homes. He claimed, on Insiders,that planning changes that allow more housing won't change a thing. Mr Chandler-Mather interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Griffith is warned. Mr ALBANESE: He went on to say, 'That won't change a thing, because what we know right now is that the planning system is not the barrier to fixing the housing crisis.' I tell you what: when you look at each of the states and all of our capital cities, we know that planning is a big problem. But, of course, one of his colleagues—the member for Brisbane, who's not here today—has opposed an apartment building in his inner-city electorate because it would, to quote him, 'have a substantive impact on the views of existing nearby residents', and then, where there's another development that would turn an empty sand and gravel factory into 381 apartments, it's because there would be too many car parks associated with it. He is also concerned that the height of the building would impact the 'unique character of this heritage neighbourhood'. And the member for Brisbane's justification for opposing this very sensible build-to-rent scheme was that developers would build the buildings. That's what they put in their media release.