Mr ALBANESE (Grayndler—Prime Minister) (14:08): Today we've come another step closer to delivering our mandate, our mandate that we received at the election, our mandate that was fully modelled by RepuTex—and that we stand by. Our mandate will see a 43 per cent reduction in emissions by 2030. While we're doing it, we'll create 604,000 new jobs, five out of every six of them in regional Australia. Our mandate will see the renewable sector, as part of the National Energy Market, grow to 82 per cent by 2030—all part of our plan to go to net zero by 2050. And I'm pleased that we have had statements today across this parliament from people who are prepared to not get everything that they want but are prepared to acknowledge the fact that we need to end the climate wars. With those opposite it was very different, because prior to the 2019 election the then shadow minister said there would be a 25 per cent reduction in the average NEM wholesale spot price to less than $70 per megawatt hour by the end of 2021. That was what was said at that time by the minister, now the shadow Treasurer. In May 2019, the average wholesale price was $93—in 2019. The SPEAKER: Manager of Opposition Business, a point of order? Mr Fletcher: I take a point of order on relevance. The question's very specific: will the Australian people be getting the $275 cut you promised them? The SPEAKER: On the point of order, the Leader of the House? Mr Burke: Mr Speaker, we keep being told that the question's very specific, and then a corner of the question is all that is read out. Under previous Speakers there's consistently been a principle that, where a question has various rhetorical comments in it, that widens the ambit of the answer. The SPEAKER: The question was very broad, and the Prime Minister is in order. Mr ALBANESE: Thank you very much. I can see why they don't want to hear this. They promised it would be $70; it was $93. And guess what it was: $341—missed by this much! It was missed by just $271.25! They promised $70 and delivered $341. And now, in their opposition to the cheapest form of energy—renewables—they've come up with the most expensive as the solution: nuclear power. Putting the member for Fairfax in charge of a review on nuclear power bears an uncanny resemblance to Mr Burns putting Homer Simpson in charge of nuclear power safety in Springfield! No-one loves a reactor like a reactionary, so it's no wonder they're so obsessed by nukes over there. The truth is, renewables are the cheapest. We will deliver increased renewables into the system. (Time expired) Mr Pasin interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Barker will cease interjecting.