Mr MORRISON (Cook—Prime Minister and Minister for the Public Service) (14:39): As I've indicated to the House before and I'll indicate again today, this work is being done by the secretary of my department. It's being done at arm's length from me. I have no involvement in that process, and nor should I. That would be inappropriate. The secretary should conduct his inquiries as he sees fit and without any interference or any involvement from me as Prime Minister. That would be highly inappropriate. He has not provided me with a further update about when I might expect that report, but I have no doubt the opposition will be able to ask questions of him in Senate estimates next week, which is the appropriate place where those matters can be raised with the secretary of my department. Yet again we see the rather personal, sledging way the Leader of the Opposition is asking this question. He wishes to get into this, whether it's me or, indeed, by trying to undermine the credibility of the secretary of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet. He's undertaken personal attacks, which is his form. On our side of the House, we will take a different approach. We will appoint people as secretaries of departments because of their credibility for those jobs, whether it's Secretary Pezzullo or former Secretary Moraitis, who once sat opposite each other in opposition in Kim Beazley's office. They are fine public servants and fine secretaries. Secretary Kennedy worked for the last Labor government and is a fine public servant doing a fine job. We will put people in those jobs because they have the credibility and the experience and the professional expertise to do those jobs. In the last 12 months, our public servants have done an extraordinary job in supporting our government, whether it's been through Border Force and the work done by Secretary Pezzullo, or through Secretary Kennedy and the amazing job Treasury has done to support the Treasurer and me in putting in place JobKeeper, or, indeed, through Secretary Gaetjens, who has led our Public Service through one of the most impressive times in their performance in the Commonwealth's history. If the Leader of the Opposition wants to get himself into a character assessment— The SPEAKER: The Prime Minister will resume his seat. The Leader of the Opposition, on a point of order? Mr Albanese: Yes, Mr Speaker, on relevance. This question goes to his job and the job that his office is doing. The SPEAKER: I'll just ask the Leader of the Opposition to resume his seat. There are a number of elements to the question. I've allowed the Prime Minister to go down the track he's gone down for very good reason—because the question did have an inference in it, which itself could have been ruled out of order on a strict reading of the standing orders, about the secretary of his department. Mr Albanese interjecting— The SPEAKER: It did, when it asked why the sports rorts inquiry took two weeks and why this is taking so long. If he's doing the inquiry, well, that is an inference. I'm allowing the— Mr Albanese interjecting— The SPEAKER: And he's responding to it. I mean, I didn't write the question. He's responding to it. The Prime Minister has the call. Mr MORRISON: If the Leader of the Opposition wants to get into a character assessment contest with the secretary of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, he won't come up very well on that one. He's saying he wants to be in a character assessment test with me. I'm happy to accept that challenge. I'm happy to have my character as an individual in this place and my personal conduct matched against this Leader of the Opposition's any day of the week.