Mr MORRISON (Cook—Prime Minister and Minister for the Public Service) (14:33): I thank the member for her question. The issues that she has raised go to why our government is taking action on climate change. That is why. That is why we signed up to the Paris Agreement and we've made our commitment— Ms Coker interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Prime Minister will just pause for a second. The member for Corangamite will leave under standing order 94(a). Yes, that's right. I asked you to cease interjecting. I warned you, you kept interjecting and now you're leaving. That's the way it works. The Prime Minister has the call. Mr MORRISON: That is why our government is taking action on climate change. That is why we signed up to the Paris Agreement and that's why we're meeting our targets. As I said, we are meeting the Kyoto targets. I must note, when we announced, 10 years ago, our plan to achieve the Kyoto emissions reduction target, it was mocked by those opposite. They said you couldn't do it without a carbon tax. It was mocked by others around this place, but I'll tell you what: it wasn't mocked by the Australian people, because they backed that plan at the 2013 election, seven years out from that 2020 target, and we delivered on that commitment. And we have not only met but beat our targets by 2020. Mr Gosling interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Prime Minister will resume his seat. The member for Solomon is warned! The member for Warringah on a point of order. Mr Gosling interjecting — The SPEAKER: The member for Solomon is warned. The member for Warringah on a point of order. Ms Steggall: The point of order is relevance. The question went to what is the cost. The SPEAKER: As I often point out, the question had a long preamble. I don't want to have an argument with the member for Warringah, but I listened very carefully and there was quite a long preamble before she got to a very specific question. If you need the answer to be tied tightly to a specific question, you need to not have a broad preamble that allows the minister or the Prime Minister answering it to range more widely. The Prime Minister is in order. Mr MORRISON: It is because we do understand there are costs associated with climate change that we, indeed, are taking action on climate change to reduce emissions. But I tell you what we also need to do to take action on climate change: we need to build the resilience of this country for the climate that we need to live in, that we will live in, for the economy that we must grow in this climate and in the environment that we are in. We need to put in place adaption measures to ensure that Australians can thrive in the climate we will live in while taking the action, the necessary action, when it comes to emission reduction. We will also take action on building the dams, which means climate action now, on hazard reduction, which is climate action now just as emissions reduction is climate action now. We will take those actions because we understand the risks and the need to take action in relation to those risks. Those opposite don't offer any plans. They don't offer any policies. They have an uncosted, glib— The SPEAKER: I just say to the Prime Minister— Honourable members interjecting— The SPEAKER: Members can cease interjecting just for a second. It's very difficult for the Prime Minister to go to the policies of those opposite when, one, he wasn't asked about it and, two, the question was from an Independent. The Prime Minister either needs to wrap his answer up or—the Prime Minister has the call. Mr MORRISON: I'm happy to do that. I'm asked about the costs of climate. What I can assure the Australian people is they will always pay the price of Labor's failed climate policies.