Mr TAYLOR (Hume—Minister for Energy and Emissions Reduction) (14:39): I've said to the Prime Minister what I have said to the House, and I'll remind those opposite— Opposition members interjecting— Mr TAYLOR: I'll remind those opposite that I made a statement in the House— The SPEAKER: The minister will just pause for a second. Members on my left, I need to be able to hear the answer. Mr TAYLOR: I stand by the statement that I tabled in the House earlier this week, and I've got nothing to add to it. As I have said repeatedly to the House, I reject absolutely the suggestion that I or any members of my staff altered the documents in question. The SPEAKER: The minister will just pause for a second. The member for Hindmarsh on a point of order. Mr Butler: Direct relevance. I asked— The SPEAKER: The member for Hindmarsh will resume his seat. I know exactly what you asked; I've got a summary of it in front of me. The minister is being directly relevant to the question. The minister does not have to answer the question in the way you want. It's well established. As I've said, the standing orders require him to be directly relevant and you have taken your one point of order on relevance. The minister has the call. Mr TAYLOR: This is a pathetic, outrageous accusation by those opposite. We know exactly what this is about. It's about distracting us from our strong focus on delivering a fair deal on energy for all Australians. I'm pleased to report, according to the ABS, we've had the first ever— The SPEAKER: The minister is now straying beyond the question. The minister needs to be directly relevant to the question. The question did not ask about any ABS figures or anything of the like. The minister needs to be directly relevant or resume his seat. Mr TAYLOR: Those opposite are all smear and no idea.