Ms PLIBERSEK (Sydney—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:13): My question is to the Prime Minister. The government claims its decision to endorse a white supremacist slogan in the Senate was an administrative error. Was it an administrative error when the government voted to cut $14 billion from public schools? Was it eight administrative errors when it voted to cut penalty rates? Was it 26 administrative errors when the Prime Minister voted against a banking royal commission? Is the government's message in Wentworth really: vote for a government that has absolutely no idea what it's doing? The SPEAKER: The Leader of the House on a point of order. Mr Pyne: Mr Speaker, the preamble to that question is deeply offensive. I would point out to the House that the Senate has just recommitted the motion from yesterday and has unanimously voted against it. To continue to repeat that canard is quite offensive and I'd ask the member to not do so. The SPEAKER: Manager of Opposition Business, I don't think I need your point of order. I understand the point the Leader of the House is making, but it's really not for me to judge those matters. It's really not. The question is in order. The Prime Minister has the call.