Mr FRYDENBERG (Kooyong—Minister for the Environment and Energy) (15:02): I thank the member for Forrest for her question and know that she is very concerned about the future of industry in the south-west of her state. She is concerned about not only the affordability of power but also its sustainability and ensuring that it is low-emissions technology. That is why she and other coalition members on this side of the House welcome our announcement that we are seeking to amend the legislation of the Clean Energy Finance Corporation to enable it to invest in carbon capture and storage. Back in 2011-12 there was a political fix, and the political fix was between the Labor Party and their alliance partners, the Greens. They ruled out carbon capture and storage as one of the prohibited technologies that could be funded under the CEFC. This is despite the fact that the International Energy Agency says it is not optional, when it comes to reducing emissions, to rule out CCS. And it is despite the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change saying that the cost of meeting Paris commitments would be double if you did not have CCS. It is despite the fact that you can get a 90 per cent emissions reduction by using CCS, not just for thermal generation—gas and coal—but also, importantly, for industrial processes: chemicals, steel, cement. That is why the coalition's announcement was welcomed by the likes of BHP, BlueScope, the Business Council of Australia, Energy Networks Australia and Shell. And indeed it was entirely consistent with the comments of the member for Corio, the member for McMahon, the opposition leader in the Senate, the member for Lilley and indeed the member for Port Adelaide. Opposition members interjecting— Government members interjecting— The SPEAKER: Members on my right will cease interjecting. Mr FRYDENBERG: All the members opposite have supported carbon capture and storage. The SPEAKER: The Manager of Opposition Business? Mr Burke: Mr Speaker, on your earlier ruling, where you drew attention to all interjections being disorderly and members being referred to by their title, the Treasurer has just done the exact same thing, in defiance of your ruling—and he knows he is in defiance. The SPEAKER: The Manager of Opposition Business will resume his seat. I urge the Manager of Opposition Business, if he would like—given it is Thursday, and with five minutes to go—to perhaps, with respect, review everything I said when I addressed his last point of order. I do again say to members interjecting that all interjections are disorderly, and they should bear that in mind particularly when it comes to referring to members by their correct titles. Mr FRYDENBERG: The Labor Party went to the Australian people in 2016 ahead of the election with a specific policy proposal, which was to broaden the investment of the CEFC. The member for Port Adelaide went to the Press Club and said he wanted to get rid of the ridiculous restrictions on the mandate of the CEFC. So you could imagine our surprise when the Labor Party announced that it would not support our legislative change to the CEFC. We know that the Labor Party will say one thing—it does not matter if it is on company tax, it does not matter if it is on the Medicare levy, it does not matter if it is on Gonski school funding and now it does not matter if it is on energy policy—they will say one thing to the Australian people and do another thing in this place. We all know on this side of the House that, when it comes to hypocrisy, thy name is Labor.