Mr TURNBULL (Wentworth—Prime Minister) (14:12): It is typical, I may say, of the member for Isaacs that he seeks to defame people by smear and innuendo. He has no substantive matter to question any of these people. If he does, he should raise it. The Leader of the Opposition has asked about their qualifications. Those can be provided by the Attorney in due course. But, Mr Speaker, what about an appointment that was fundamentally more momentous than an appointment to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal? What about the Leader of the Opposition's hand-picked member of the Senate—Kimberley Kitching? What did the Leader of the Opposition— Government members interjecting— The SPEAKER: Members on my right! Mr TURNBULL: do to satisfy himself that, contrary to the finding of the Heydon royal commission, she was truthful in her evidence? What did the Leader of the Opposition do to satisfy himself that the royal commission had no basis for referring her conduct to the Director of Public Prosecutions for investigation and consideration for bringing criminal charges against her? Ms Henderson interjecting— Mr Pyne interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Corangamite and the Leader of the House! Mr TURNBULL: Kimberley Kitching's conduct has been the subject of findings of a royal commission presided over by a retired High Court judge; it has been the subject of findings by the Fair Work Commission. The fact of the matter is that the Leader of the Opposition, despite many opportunities, has not had the guts to stand up and say that Kimberley Kitching is qualified to be in the Senate and the findings— The SPEAKER: The Prime Minister will resume his seat. Has the Prime Minister concluded his answer? The Prime Minister has concluded his answer.