Mr BOWEN (McMahon) (14:55): My question is to the Treasurer. Today, when asked about negative gearing excesses, the Treasurer redefined 'excesses' and said that they are now 'enthusiasms'. Given the government has refused to tell Australians and the House what the excesses in negative gearing are, will the Treasurer now outline what the enthusiasms are? Mr Pyne: Mr Speaker, is it in order for the question to now verbal the Treasurer and pretend that he said something he did not say and then demand that he had a response to that? You have been very lenient. We have been lenient on the government side and not taken points of order. But their question time strategy is in complete disarray and they need to get themselves in order. Mr Burke interjecting— The SPEAKER: I ask the Manager of Opposition Business to resume his seat. I am ready to rule on the subject. The Leader of the House raises a point of order that, essentially, relates to factual accuracy. As I think I addressed the House a fortnight or so ago, I am going to adopt the approach that Speaker Andrew adopted, in that I cannot assess the factual accuracy of questions if questions are factually inaccurate. That will be worn by the questioner. In denying a question where there is an alleged factual inaccuracy, as Speaker Andrew pointed out, I am also denying the minister an opportunity to refute it if they wish. So I am going to allow the question, and I call the Treasurer.