Mr BOWEN (McMahon) (14:57): My question is to the Treasurer. Yesterday, ABS data showed wages growth at record lows and below government forecasts. Can the Treasurer advise what the impact would be on the budget bottom line if the Treasurer's wage forecasts drop by even 0.5 per cent? Government members interjecting— The SPEAKER: I am going to continue to give the call to the member for McMahon. I did not see the member for Petrie on his feet, for which I apologise, but the member for McMahon has the call. Mr BOWEN: Madam Speaker, I have asked my question but I am happy to repeat it if you like. Yesterday ABS data showed wages growth at record— The SPEAKER: The member will resume his seat. The member for Bass, on a point of order? Mr Nikolic: Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. During the Treasurer's eloquent reply the member for Lilley, on four occasions, called the Treasurer an unparliamentary name. I ask him to withdraw. The SPEAKER: The member for Lilley would assist the House if he would withdraw. Mr Swan: I am not going to withdraw, Madam Speaker, because the Treasurer is a liar. The SPEAKER: The member for Lilley will leave under 94(a) for one hour. The member for Lilley then left the chamber. Honourable members interjecting— The SPEAKER: There will be silence on both sides of the House. The member for Chisholm has a point of order. Ms Burke: Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. Twice during question time yesterday, in an answer to a question, the Prime Minister used that same word and was not asked to withdraw on either occasion. Is the word unparliamentary or not? Honourable members interjecting— The SPEAKER: There will be silence! In answer to the question from the member for Chisholm: if someone accuses someone of being a liar, that is totally and utterly unparliamentary. The gerund or the noun can otherwise be used. But you will also notice that in the course of question time yesterday I had cause to ask the Prime Minister to withdraw the use of the word in a different grammatical form and he did. However, what is beyond any doubt is that to accuse anyone in this chamber of being a liar is totally and utterly unparliamentary, and that is why the member for Lilley is no longer in the chamber.