Mr ABBOTT (Warringah—Leader of the Opposition) (14:05): Mr Speaker, I have a supplementary question to the Prime Minister. If the Prime Minister was not truthful when she said, 'There will be no carbon tax under the government I lead,' and if the Prime Minister was not truthful when she said that she would never challenge the former Prime Minister for his job, how can people believe anything she says now? Mr Albanese: I rise on a point of order, Mr Speaker. It goes to the standing orders for questions without notice. Perhaps the Leader of the Opposition might have got away with that question if it had been in writing but, given that he gave it verbally to the House, it clearly is out of order under the standing orders with regard to argument. The SPEAKER: The first part of the point of order of the Leader of the House I would correct. If it had been a question on notice it definitely would have been out of order because there are much more stringent rules applied. Secondly, there were two aspects of the question that cause me a dilemma. One was the argument, and also it is stretching the friendship on the supplementary question. But, as I have said, the consequence of me allowing a question like that is that it widens the scope of the response. The Prime Minister has the call.