Senator STEELE-JOHN (Western Australia) (14:19): My question is to Senator Gallagher in their capacity as Minister for the National Disability Insurance Scheme. Let's be clear—autism is permanent and significant. The language 'mild or moderate' has no clinical definition. Previously the NDIS has stated that autistic children who fall in the level 2 or 3 categories of support when diagnosed are eligible for the scheme on the basis that they require either substantial or very substantial support. Can the minister explain what was meant by 'mild or moderate' autism and confirm whether it's the government's intention to remove children with a diagnosis level of 1 or 2 autism? The PRESIDENT: Minister Wong? Senator Wong: Point of order—I think the senator said 'Senator Gallagher'. Senator Gallagher is able and happy to take it as Minister for Finance. If the question is dealing with NDIS, that would be Senator McAllister. We'd seek some clarity about who you're directing the question to. The PRESIDENT: Senator Steele-John, you did indicate it was for the minister responsible for the NDIS, and that is Minister McAllister. Are you happy for me to direct the question to her? Senator Steele-John interjecting—