Senator WONG (South Australia—Minister for Foreign Affairs and Leader of the Government in the Senate) (14:31): Senator Pocock, you're generally a very considered contributor to political debate in this place, but that was not a considered contribution. I mean, to suggest that this government— An honourable senator interjecting— Senator WONG: No, I think it's reasonable. To suggest that this government, on climate policy, is doing what the IPA wants in circumstances where you know what conservative think tanks and— The PRESIDENT: Senator Pocock, on a point of order? Senator David Pocock: On relevance, my question is about a legislated duty of care, not about broader climate policy. The PRESIDENT: Thank you, Senator Pocock. You referenced your bill and the submissions received for and against, and I believe the minister is being relevant. Minister Wong. Senator WONG: With respect, Senator Pocock, you're the one who made the suggestions about the IPA. I think I'm entitled to respond on behalf of the Labor government. What I'd say to you is: we understand how important action on climate change is. We fought to ensure a cap on emissions in government. It was obviously highly contested. You may remember the sort of scare campaign that was run by those opposite, including $100 roasts. Notwithstanding that, we have always held our position on climate, and we have gone to numerous elections and we have fought the argument— (Time expired) The PRESIDENT: Senator Pocock, a second supplementary?