Mr SIMPKINS (Cowan) (14:53): Madam Speaker, my question is to the Minister for Health. A constituent in my electorate, Ms Whitehouse, has complained to me that the Wanneroo GP Super Clinic is still not open and is yet to see a single patient after being promised by Labor in September 2007. Can the minister update the House on how delays to the Wanneroo GP Super Clinic have affected the provision of health in my electorate? Mr Fitzgibbon: Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order under standing order 100 and I refer you to Practice on page 560. I have noticed the government have been using a style which allows their backbenchers to name constituents—no doubt for political advantage in their electorates, and I can partly understand that—but it is clearly out of order under standing order 100 and page 560 of House of Representatives Practice. Mr Pyne: Madam Speaker, the standing orders say that the name of a person can be included in a question, especially if it authenticates the statement that is being made in the question. The member for Cowan was talking about a particular constituent. If we had not named the constituent, Mr Fitzgibbon would have taken the point of order that this might not actually be true. Naming the constituent adds lustre to the question because you can be certain that the claim has been authenticated. The SPEAKER: I would just add— Mr Champion interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Wakefield will remove himself under 94(a). The member for Wakefield then left the chamber. The SPEAKER: For the benefit of the House, I would also add the words of standing order 100, which are important in this question: … and are strictly necessary to make the question intelligible. I think it meets that description. Mr Fitzgibbon interjecting— The SPEAKER: There is no point of order. Mr Fitzgibbon interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member will take his seat. Mr Fitzgibbon: It is a new point of order, Madam Speaker. The SPEAKER: It had better be. Mr Fitzgibbon: Madam Speaker, I thank the Leader of the House for his intervention, and indeed his assistance, because on page 560 of Practice it clearly says: Questions must not contain names of persons unless they can be authenticated … What the Leader of the House has pointed out is that they need to be authenticated. Indeed, the question did nothing to authenticate the quote used by the member asking the question. The SPEAKER: There is no point of order.