Senator WONG (South Australia—Minister for Foreign Affairs and Leader of the Government in the Senate) (14:46): Thank you to Senator Pratt for her question and for her advocacy over many years, like many on this side, for action on climate. The government's safeguard mechanism reforms are, really, the first chance in over a decade for us to implement climate action that gets us towards net zero. That's the important thing: how do we get to the targets that have been set, which I thought the opposition supported? I'll say more about them shortly. Australian businesses are pleading for it because they know that reducing emissions is essential to their long-term competitiveness in a global net-zero economy. We want to deliver sensible pro-climate reforms that the Australian people voted for and that businesses need so they can reduce emissions. Senator Canavan interjecting— Senator WONG: But those opposite—I think Senator Canavan is demonstrating it now—oppose reforms, because there is a pathology of political conflict over there. You're not interested in solutions. You're not actually interested in reducing emissions. You're not interested in having a mechanism which enables the market to have certainty so we can deliver net zero, which, supposedly, you support in principle. You're not interested in that, but you are interested in having conflict—the same old fights, reheated for 2023. Of course, you have to ask the opposition who they are actually fighting for. Who are you fighting for? You're not fighting for businesses, because we know the business community supported this. You're not fighting for working Australians. You opposed both new jobs and secure jobs, whether it's the minimum— Opposition senators interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Order! Please continue, Senator Wong. Senator WONG: You're not fighting for working Australians. You opposed new jobs in your opposition to the National Reconstruction Fund, and you opposed a boost to the minimum wage. You're not fighting for families, because you voted no to energy price relief just weeks before Christmas. The question to you is: whose side are you on? (Time expired) The PRESIDENT: I'm going to wait until there is silence before I call Senator Pratt. Senator McKenzie interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Senator McKenzie, it seems to be a habit of yours that the minute I call order you continue to call out. Senator Pratt, a first supplementary question?