Senator GALLAGHER (Australian Capital Territory—Minister for the Public Service, Minister for Finance, Minister for Women, Manager of Government Business in the Senate and Vice-President of the Executive Council) (14:18): We've made clear what our position is on the announcement that we made last week. The Prime Minister has made it clear on other aspects that have been raised in the last week. We have been very clear. It is a very small change. It affects a very small number of fortunate people who have managed to save more than $3 million in their super. Good on them. Good luck to them. Their concessionality will be slightly reduced compared to what— Senator Hume: A point of order Madam President: the question was about the First Home Super Saver Scheme and whether the government would repeal it or abolish it. Senator Wong: On the point of order, the question also started with a reference to the family home. Hence, the minister's answer is entirely relevant. The PRESIDENT: It did have a couple of sentences before then, Senator Hume. I think the minister is being relevant, but I will continue to listen. If the minister isn't being relevant, I will remind her of the question. Senator GALLAGHER: Thank you. I did answer the question in my first remarks. Senator McGrath: No, you didn't. Senator GALLAGHER: Yes, I did. I said we have announced the changes that the government has agreed upon. We have announced them. You have the detail. You're opposed to it. We hear that. We know that you are going to die in a ditch for people with balances over $3 million, regardless of what's happening in other parts of the economy. I have answered the question. We have been clear with what our position is. The change was announced last week. (Time expired) The PRESIDENT: Senator Hume, a second supplementary question.