Mr RANDALL (Canning) (14:45): My question is for the Prime Minister. I remind the Prime Minister of evidence given in Senate estimates that police are not notified of the whereabouts of illegal arrivals by boat due to privacy reasons. Given the cuts to Australian government security agencies and given that more than 10,000 asylum seekers have been released into the community without appropriate ASIO checks, does the Prime Minister support this position? Mr Albanese: Madam Speaker, on a point of order. There is a bit of argument there. The SPEAKER: There was a great deal of argument in the question. I was going to give them the member for Canning the opportunity to rephrase if he wants. Mr Pyne: Madam Speaker, on the point of order, the first sentence of the question delivers a testimony from the evidence given in Senate estimates last night and quotes from Senate estimates last night. It talks about the cuts to security agencies, which have occurred every year for the last five years— Mr Dreyfus interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Manager of Opposition Business will resume his seat. The Attorney-General will leave the chamber under 94(a). Continuing after warnings is not to be tolerated from anybody. The member for Isaacs then left the chamber . Mr Albanese: Madam Speaker, on the point of order, I think the Manager of Opposition Business has just confirmed the argument that is in the question. The SPEAKER: I was going to seek the member for Canning to rephrase the last part of the question. Mr RANDALL: We were aware that there are cuts, so does the Prime Minister support— Honourable members interjecting— The SPEAKER: Order! The member for Canning has the call. He has been put on the spot, so I will ask him to commence again and to be given the courtesy of silence in the chamber. Mr RANDALL: I refer to the cuts and the 10,000 asylum seekers that have been released into the community, and the security implications. Does the Prime Minister support this position?