Senator McKENZIE (Victoria—Minister for Agriculture and Leader of the Nationals in the Senate) (14:48): Thank you very much, Senator Bilyk. It's been great to head down to your home state recently to talk about how gangbusters agriculture is going in the great state of Tasmania. And it's not just agriculture: thanks to the election of the Liberal Hodgman government, it's fisheries and forestry as well. Our side of politics backs agriculture, its growth and development. The National Party knows how important a vibrant agricultural industry is to regional employment and how it underpins our national economy. That is exactly what we've been doing post the election: focusing on how we grow and develop agricultural employment and more market access; ensuring that our farmers are more competitive internationally— The PRESIDENT: Senator Bilyk on a point of order. Senator Bilyk: I'm rising on a point of order, on relevance. The minister has not gone anywhere near answering the question, which was: can she confirm that her poor performance as Minister for Agriculture is causing tensions in her own party room? The PRESIDENT: Order. Senator Bilyk, I'm not going to allow the word 'relevance' to be inserted before re-reading the second part of a loaded question. It would be difficult for me to rule the minister out of order because, as I said yesterday, as long as ministers are directly referring to or addressing, including challenging, material or assertions contained in a question or a preamble—as long as they are directly doing that—I think that is being directly relevant. Senator McKenzie. Senator McKENZIE: I reject the second part of that very long-winded question, but I'm very proud to talk about our government's performance in agriculture since the election. The PRESIDENT: Senator Bilyk, a final supplementary question?