Senator BIRMINGHAM (South Australia—Minister for Trade, Tourism and Investment and Deputy Leader of the Government in the Senate) (14:12): It is on the public record, the legal structure as to the ownership of those lands— Senator Wong interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Order! Senator Wong, the minister has been speaking for seven seconds, and I actually believe he was being relevant at that point. Do you have a point of order? Senator Wong: Yes, a point of order on direct relevance—and I'll take the interjection that he's been speaking for only seven seconds. We'll give you leave for an hour, mate, if you actually answer the question! How about that? The PRESIDENT: Order, Senator Wong. Senator Wong: The question is not about company structures. The question is only requesting that this minister confirm that there is a single compliance and it relates to Minister Taylor's land. The PRESIDENT: At the point that Senator Birmingham was interrupted, I was hearing him talk about ownership of land, which I believe is directly relevant to the question. Senator BIRMINGHAM: In relation to compliance matters, Mr Taylor has been clear: he's never been engaged in relation to compliance matters. The Public Service has been clear: they've never been engaged in relation to compliance matters. And, through you, Mr President—'mate', Mr Taylor has been very clear in relation to the ownership and declaration of his ownerships, and I refer you very clearly to the statement that he made to the House on these matters. Senator Wong: This is a disgrace. The PRESIDENT: Senator Wong, I'll take your observation. It is not up to the chair to direct a minister how to answer the question. That is a matter for debate subsequent to question time and for others to make judgements about. My only role here is: is the minister being directly relevant to the question? And in that case I believe the minister was, even if people didn't like the answer. Senator O'Neill, a final supplementary question.